Can an Employee’s ERISA Rights Be Waived As Part of an Employment-Based General Release and Waiver?

September 10th, 2008

Most employers have a standard release and waiver that is usually used in conjunction with severance packages for former employees. The former employee agrees not to bring suit against the employer in exchange for the offered severance package. Most release and waivers use broad, inclusive language (as broad as permitted by various employment laws) to ensure that the employer gains the most protection it can. In general, the release and waiver would include language that releases the employer from any claims for employment and/or re-employment by the employee and discharges the employer from any and all causes of actions arising from the employee’s employment. Within this language, specific causes of action and/or statutes are named as examples, including the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).

Generally, severance release and waivers are held to be enforceable, provided they comply with specific provisions required by laws such as the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA). However, with regards to waiving ERISA rights, a couple of recent cases indicate that employers need to evaluate their release and waiver language and procedures to ensure that they are getting the maximum protection against ERISA claims by former employees.

In March 2006, the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut ruled on Linder v. BYK-Chemie USA Inc. In this case, an executive executed a release and waiver upon termination of employment. However, after termination, he brought suit against his former employer based on the calculations used in the executive’s supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP). The court ultimately found that, in this specific case, the executive was barred from bringing suit by the executed release. However, in its ruling, the court adopted the position that the release of ERISA/benefit claims should require a greater scrutiny than the release of general claims. Therefore, the totality of the circumstances surrounding the release should be reviewed to ensure that the employee’s waiver of claims was voluntary and knowing.

In September 2007, the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota ruled on Groska v. Northern States Power Co. Pension Plan. In this case, two employers merged and employees were offered a choice of either competing for remaining positions or terminating employment with severance benefits. The plaintiff, Groska, opted to terminate employment and accept severance benefits, which required the execution of a release and waiver. Groska subsequently filed suit under ERISA, alleging improper claim denial and breach of fiduciary duty. With regard to the improper claim denial allegation, the court found that Groska had knowingly and voluntarily signed the release and waiver, so it was enforceable and barred the claim for improper denial. However, the court did not dismiss the breach of fiduciary claim as barred by the release and waiver. The court held that because ERISA recognizes the plan as a separate and distinct legal entity from the employer/plan sponsor, the release and waiver in favor of the employer did not automatically release the plan. Therefore, participants were still able to bring a claim against the plan itself under ERISA.

These decisions should prompt employers to review their “standard” release and waiver language and their processes for obtaining the executed release from former employees. Since the waiving of ERISA claims can be seen as needing a greater level of scrutiny than general contract claims, employers should evaluate whether the language currently being used provides the greatest shield possible. Additionally, since an employer’s release and waivers may not extend protection to the ERISA plan, the language should be updated to ensure the plan itself is afforded the greatest degree of protection available through the employer’s release and waiver. Benefits counsel can assist employers in reviewing the existing release and waiver language. Please contact our office with any questions or for additional information on how our attorneys can assist you.

7 Responses to “Can an Employee’s ERISA Rights Be Waived As Part of an Employment-Based General Release and Waiver?”

  1. Margarite Sauerson 30 Dec 2012 at 2:09 pm

    Hello there, I observed your site by means of Yahoo and google although trying to find a related subject, your web site came up, it seems to be very good. I’ve bookmarked it in my yahoo and google bookmarks.

  2. Marquitta Harpsteron 18 Apr 2013 at 7:02 pm

    I additionally to my buddies had been thinking about the nice tactics observed on your internet site even though all of the sudden developed a horrible feeling I hardly ever thanked the net webpage operator for individuals strategies. Those people ladies turned entirely enthusiastic to review all of them and have in fact been tapping into these details. Thank you for purely currently being properly accommodating and also for picking these kinds of great helpful guides most individuals are truly wanting to be informed on. My very individual sincere regret for not expressing gratitude to you sooner.

  3. Abbason 14 Sep 2014 at 3:20 pm

    With Tyvon Branch out for week 15 vs KC, do you think Mike Mitchell will have similar stats as Branch? All the DB1s and most of the DB2s are rotrseed. Dawan Landry is available. Is there a sleeper DB that you would start in week 15 over these two?Standard IDP scoringBrianCharlotte, NC

  4. Medon 19 Feb 2015 at 4:23 pm

    Renting a car certainly gives you fdeorem and flexibility when traveling in Canada. You’re not tied to a timetable and you can go to almost anywhere of interest. Just make sure, however, that you know your route before you start so you can have a safe and enjoyable journey.

  5. Nathalieon 24 Mar 2015 at 2:27 am

    I got to hear Clay in Atlantic City. He is indesribable! We alawys say he has a God given voice but its a hundred times more!Clay made my insides feel like I was made of jello.I think all the angels in heaven were cheering him on.and THANK YOU clackers! U gave me the chance to see seat was in the front but at the opposite end from where Clay was and there were just 2 others behind me in the dark. in front of me it was all closed off and dark. the 2 ladies behind me were southern church ladies . they kept on saying LAWDY! THAT BOY CAN SING!and sometimes they sounded like they were having orgasms. LAWDY! YES JESUS YES JESUS YESSSSS!!!and I was able to give a birthday card signed by other fans to the security people.I made it from poster boardamnd I told them there was something for NIP too. that was really important that Clay got that.I have never in my life been so moved by anyone ever.the Staten Island theatre is really beautiful!

  6. auto insurance Ashburnon 14 Apr 2015 at 2:05 pm

    Let me preface my idea by anticipating some of your rebuttals. My system could potentially add a significant number of games to the teams’ schedules, and I know there’s sort of an unspoken understanding that everything needs to be completed in early January. However, not in this case. School goes from Sept to May, and college football is a big enough money maker that if it lasts longer than the normal football season, so be it. After all, it is free labor

  7. Juliaon 24 Apr 2015 at 10:31 pm

    One of the things I aredod about Clay, right from the beginning, was that he was so into helping children. From his early beginnings with the YMCA, and then teaching a classroom of Autistic children, then going to College to get his Special Education Degree. All the while, helping the Bubel family with Mike, and his autism. His voice hooked me, but he not only talked about making changes he did them. And as we found out over the years, Clay does a lot of these things without the press. So you know he wants to do these things without the “photo op”.Nice article today Musicfan thanks for all these good reads

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply